Tuesday started as a pretty good day. It was sunny and pleasant outside, work was chugging along, Craig got a nice, unexpected raise, and Carter came bounding in the door after school, complaining about homework but eager to get it done. And then I made the mistake of checking the internet and seeing the horrific news headline that kids had been shot and killed at an elementary school in Texas. The first count in the headline was two, but the story itself had already been updated with another total: 14. My heart just dropped. As of today that total is 19 kids and two teachers. Absolutely devastating. All I could think was that it was Sandy Hook: The Sequel, and I just couldn't fathom that this had happened again.
The kids were in fourth grade, so this hits far too close to home. The school itself was second to fourth grades. Carter's is third to fifth. It truly felt like Sandy Hook all over again, when Jacob was just a couple years younger than the kids who were killed there, but it was a little different since he was not in school yet. This time Carter is just one year younger. I blogged about Sandy Hook a couple years later when Jacob reached their same age, and you can read that here. I said in that post, "And while the odds of something like that ever happening again are slim, sometimes I can't help but wonder, 'Why couldn't it happen here? No one there ever thought it could happen there, so why should here be any different? What's stopping someone from doing the same sort of thing here?'" I guess those odds were slim, but 9-1/2 years later, here we are again--it happened. Not here, but somewhere else--a small town, no less--so it's just more validation that it could absolutely happen here. And now we know the odds aren't as slim as we thought.
I still remember watching the news when Columbine happened and school shootings were still unheard of. I was a junior in college and the news update popped up during our daily General Hospital/Oprah/Rosie O'Donnell afternoon TV block. We just couldn't fathom that someone shot up a high school. We were only a few years removed from high school at the time, and it was unthinkable. But since then it's been such a frequent occurrence, whether it's a high school or a college or a place of business. But Sandy Hook in Newtown and Robb Elementary in Uvalde will always stand out for the fact that they were full of completely innocent children who had absolutely ZERO to do with whatever the gunmen had on their minds. In a high school, sure, you have bullying and love triangles that lead to these sorts of things. Heck, even my high school had a love triangle stabbing two years before I got there. But in the case of the elementary school kids, you know they had absolutely no connection to the perpetrator and it's absolutely just senseless.
The thought of an entire classroom getting gunned down, what those kids and teachers saw before they died, what other kids in the building heard as it happened and saw as they exited, it's just so horrific. I can't even let myself imagine what every parent went through waiting for updates, though particularly the ones who waited 10 hours only to find out they lost their kids. The agony of that wait had to be bad enough, and to have it be bad news in the end is just heart-wrenching. The thought of sending either of my kids to school and having them not come home is just unthinkable, but obviously Carter comes to mind more right now since these kids were around his age. I know Carter is such a bright light in my life--he gives me all the hugs and "I love yous" that I can possibly handle (and then some) and he is my little adventure buddy, the kind of big kid relationship I could only dream of when Jacob was a high-maintenance baby or a mischievous toddler and I longed for something a little easier and less one-sided. I'm not sure how I would survive if I lost either child, but my day-to-day joy alone would take a deathly hit without Carter around. I mourn for those parents who likely had the same relationship with their children. It's just unspeakably tragic. And yesterday the news came out that the husband of one of the teachers passed away from a fatal heart attack two days after she died. It's a romantic notion that he died of a broken heart, but the reality is that they leave behind four kids and this tragedy just got worse.
Of course, politics had to get involved. And that is almost equally as disgusting because one side will not let anyone touch their precious gun rights even though they could make a difference. The right is pushing the mental health aspect of this SO heavily, while the left is stuck on the gun legislation argument. Both are huge issues, and both contribute, but one can have a more immediate impact. This cannot be a one trick pony solution. That said, here are some things that piss me off about the whole thing:
- This shooter clearly had issues but there was no documented mental health history on this one so how would mental health treatment or flagging have helped here? I still want it to happen because it will catch some people, but why emphasize it here when it's irrelevant?
- The shooter was allowed to legally purchase a gun when he turned 18. In fact, it was apparently the first thing he did. How is it OK for an 18-year-old to buy a freaking semi-automatic weapon? We don't even let 18-year-olds buy alcohol at that age because their brains are still very deficient in impulse control and logical decision-making. But a gun that's main purpose is to kill? SURE!
- If mental health is so important, then we should really have universal federal health care that makes it fully available to everyone. But wait, that would be socialism. Never mind that the Texas governor was talking about expanding care but he already recently cut hundreds of millions worth of funding for mental health care. What kind of double talk is this?
- Mental health treatment is a great thing--we have used it, clearly--but you know what you need for it to work? A willing participant. I don't understand how they think we can rehabilitate people who have mass shooter tendencies when they see nothing wrong with their line of thinking. So what are we going to do? We have to identify them, first and foremost, and then either have to incarcerate them (under what charges?) or we have to force them into treatment...so how does that happen?
- If they really want the mental health treatment to work on kids who could become shooters in the future, that's a really long timeline and we have a lot of dangerous people floating around now. And per my previous point, how are we supposed to find them and treat them? And even if we could flip that treatment switch today, healing won't happen quickly anyway. We need something sooner.
- I've seen all of these things saying that "we can't legislate away evil" and clearly gun laws don't work because cities like Chicago have the worst gun violence amidst the strongest laws. Well...here's the thing. We may not be able to legislate away evil, but 19 dead kids and two dead teachers makes me think we should certainly f***ing try. What we're doing (or not doing) isn't working. Something has to change, and the mental health aspect isn't going to impact things quickly enough. The other irony of this is that abortion isn't going away either, but they sure don't have any issue trying to eliminate that through legislation!
- I had someone else in my Facebook feed upset that the guns are such a focus. He admits there's an issue but still thinks mental health should get more attention. The reason guns are such a focus is because a) something like 90% of Americans (gun owners or not) think there should be background checks and other precautions in order to own a gun. Congress has been sitting on legislation for years that would make it a reality, but they won't vote it in because the right's ties to the NRA are too strong. It matters not that their constituents seem to want it. But it's one thing that could happen that could make a difference and make it quickly, so of course people are fixated on it. It's the lowest hanging fruit; and b) if we can do anything to get the guns out of the hands of these psychos, they can't shoot people. Yes, they could use a knife or a bat or in some cases a van, but generally those people don't succeed in killing as many people as these shooters do. Any amount of limitations could stop a shooting, and even one less shooting is worth it to those who were saved.
- All countries across the world have mental health issues. And yes, they do have their psychos who use the aforementioned knives, bats, and vans to kill people. But all of it--particularly the gun violence--happens far less often. So something is different. Is there a chance part of that is the stricter gun laws? Worth a shot at trying, isn't it?
- I understand a lot of people will say that you can't stop a criminal--they will still get an illegal gun and do their thing, hence the Chicago argument. And to some degree they're right. But, first, oddly, why I don't hear calls for mental health treatment in Chicago? Second, my thinking is that if you create lots of obstacles for someone to get a gun, to the point they need to get it illegally, you're creating some additional opportunities for them to get caught. It might take longer, they'll need to talk to different people, they might need to go somewhere out of the ordinary. And perhaps over that process they will be intercepted by law enforcement or their family and friends will pick up on something being off and call them on it. And, if what they're doing is illegal, then prosecute the heck out of them. Make it hard, either way.
- The thing is, I don't really care as much about your hunting rifles or personal protection pistols. If you go through the proper steps, then fine. Have them, but keep them secure. There are far more responsible gun owners out there than bad ones. But there is no need for anything like an AR-15 to be in the hands of a civilian. They are killing machines, end of story, and your entertainment shooting one should never rank higher than someone else's safety. They should not be available at all due to the potential danger they pose out in public in the wrong hands. We've seen it over and over--it's not an isolated problem anymore. Legislate and limit the hell out of them. Make it financially prohibitive too, if you can, so at least we're making a good buck off it that can fund something important. Make many hoops for someone to jump through to get one. If we can regulate cars, do it with guns--testing, training, licensing, insuring, registering and re-registering. And again, if they deviate from that plan, make the penalties severe. It's a serious gun and it needs serious treatment.
- Speaking of responsible gun owners, why are they so resistant to common sense gun laws and background checks? If they're so responsible, they should pass through all of those, correct? I would think they'd want their exclusive club to be just that--exclusive and full of like-minded, safe gun owners. So why put up such resistance to something that could make gun ownership more accepted and trusted? All I can figure (aside from the financial NRA connection) is that they think there's going to be a slippery slope of different legislation that will eventually exclude everyone. But that's a big leap and it's unfair to block everything because you're assuming the worst. And if I'm honest, I don't really want someone with documented issues with mental health, heavy medication, domestic violence or other violent crimes to have any gun, let alone one that is capable of such carnage. So if you have any of those on your record, my apologies, but maybe you're better off without. Or maybe you'll need to settle for something less to accomplish your gun needs.
- There's talk about adding armed resource officers and even arming teachers. If teachers want to be armed, that's fine, but what about when a student accesses their gun or they accidentally shoot someone in the crossfire? Teachers who don't want to be armed should definitely not have to be--they have enough to worry about without that level of life-and-death decision making. I'm fine with armed resource officers as long as there is an incredible background check process to make sure psychos don't do it just to get access to schools. But we've seen that even having that level of protection doesn't always work because real-life shooters bring out a desire for self-preservation in some of those officers, so once again, that's just one area for improvement. Even in this case, it came out that cops wouldn't go in the building for an hour because they were waiting for the SWAT team. Ridiculous. Ironically, a woman with a pistol just shot dead a guy who tried to shoot up a party with an AR-15. Everyone's hailing her as a hero, of course, and the "good guy with a gun" narrative is making the rounds, but a) she (and everyone at that party) was lucky his aim wasn't better; and b) wouldn't it have been better if that gun wasn't around for him to access in the first place?
Earlier today I read an account from one of the students who was a survivor of one of the classrooms. The details she shared, from how the teacher was shot, to how the kids found the teacher's cell phone to call 911, to how she ended up smearing herself in her friend's blood and laying among her dead friends to play dead herself and ultimately save her life, absolutely broke my heart. The scars of this incident will last forever--from the kids who experienced, it to the families who lost loved ones, to the town that will have one class that's a lot smaller than the others for the next eight years. It took a while to compose myself after reading that, because the thought of any kid having to do those things or recover from those memories made me so sad and sick. It's just unfathomable that accounts like that don't make politicians act.
Here's the thing--the fact that the right so vehemently shuts down the idea that additional gun legislation could help, even in the face of clear examples around the world, just shows me that it's completely forced by their blind allegiance to the gun lobby and their party. This is NOT what the second amendment was talking about, and none of these other solutions could more quickly set the stage to decrease the likelihood of this happening again. We won't get the guns off the street quickly (although Australia did one heck of a buyback program after a tragedy there years ago), but stopping even one purchase today could stop a shooting tomorrow. Anyway, their straight-up denial despite evidence to the contrary and an urgency to find anything that will help is so robotic and shockingly illogical. That's not even taking into consideration that most of their constituents are in favor of more regulations, and they're choosing to completely ignore it. There's no room for compromise or discussion--they simply insist it won't work.
Even if changing gun laws won't work instantly, it could have another impact in the long run. Our entire country has grown up with guns being pervasive. While many of us have more moderate views of gun rights and laws, there are lots of people who strongly believe their right to own a gun is part of being a citizen of a free country. They will put that right above all else because it's patriotic, but I'm starting to think it has just enhanced the "me" culture in this country. We've come to a point (with a lot of things) where we believe that what works for us is our God-given right, common good be damned. Even abortion falls into that category, so it's happening on all sides. But in this case, someone else's right is creating a potentially dangerous situation for the general public. But maybe if more kids grow up with the understanding that guns aren't a right above all others, maybe it will start changing public perception to one that more accurately reflects other countries that don't have this problem. Maybe guns will be seen more as a privilege--and a serious one at that. I know it's literally a "right to bear arms", but that doesn't mean you have a right to take it to an extreme. Protect yourself and hunt, but having guns that can shred children so badly that DNA is needed to identify them? That is unnecessary and not what the founding fathers envisioned. I saw a meme yesterday that pondered whether a vague statement from a bunch of 18th century men who were also slaveholders was really meant to be relevant for perpetuity. I think their slaveholder status alone brings that into question, but they had no way to know what society would look like 250 years later.
I want to live in a society where even gun owners recognize that war-grade weapons have no practical purpose and protecting the innocents that may be hurt by the bad guy with a gun outweighs their right to own it. Changing the culture seems like such a small thing, but I've read accounts from other countries how they see guns so differently--even in areas heavy with farms and hunting--and I think that perspective both stems from AND works with their gun laws to create a different atmosphere. Maybe this is one small step that could start changing the culture here.
Obviously most of this will not happen quickly. I feel lucky that Carter's school already has a pretty secure front vestibule, but I think both kids' schools (including Jacob's new one) could step up protections around the building. I hope that this incident is a reminder to stay vigilant. Apparently a teacher had propped open a door and that's how the shooter got in, so things like that cannot happen. In the short term there needs to be more security and more attention given to protections because that's the only thing that could happen relatively quickly, as long as districts have budget and manpower to do it. But the long term stuff needs a multi-pronged effort and these politicians need to be willing to compromise. Slim chance, but I know everyone's worried about losing whatever advantage they have, so hopefully there are just enough angry Republicans who can put the fear of God and election losses into these politicians that won't give these laws a second thought.
It's discouraging and heartbreaking, and I know my brain has spent the last couple days trying to protect itself from really thinking about how horrible and gut-wrenching these losses are. It hits too close to home with my third grader, and all of it is just too much to let myself go there. It's a privilege to be able to do that, mind you, and I realize that. But I mourn with those families and that community and will hug my kids tighter. Nineteen kids and two teachers were supposed to start summer vacation today, and instead their families are planning funerals and trying to figure out how to survive their sadness. It's so senseless, so unnecessary, and a true embodiment of evil. I can only hope that this somehow spurs people to action, but hope is in short supply based on past experience. People have remarked how little has changed since Sandy Hook--a few more security measures and kids doing active shooter drills--and it's sickening that even this isn't making any headway. It's a true American horror story, and I guess it's our right to keep living (and dying) in it.
